Nomadic Empires

Trade was a necessity for the Mongols due to their geography and lifestyle:

• Resource Scarcity: The Steppe region (Mongolia) had an extreme climate and poor soil, making settled agriculture nearly impossible. Mongols lacked essential resources like grain and iron.
• Economic Symbiosis: They relied on trade (or raids) with their sedentary neighbors, particularly China, to exchange their pastoral products (horses, furs, game) for agricultural produce and manufactured metal wares.

Genghis Khan reorganized the tribes to consolidate power and create a unified state:

• Breaking Tribal Loyalties: The old tribal identities (like Kereyits, Naimans) were divisive. Fragmenting them prevented rebellion by old chieftains.
• Unified Identity: By mixing different tribes into new military units (the decimal system of 10s, 100s, 1000s called tumans), he created a new trans-tribal loyalty dedicated solely to the Great Khan.
• Military Efficiency: This system allowed for merit-based promotion rather than birthright, making the army highly disciplined and effective.

The yasa (legal code) reflects the tension between Mongol nomadic roots and their new role as rulers of civilized empires:

• The Conflict: Originally, the yasa regulated a nomadic life (hunting, pasture). By the mid-13th century, Mongols ruled complex urban societies (China, Persia) where these laws were often inapplicable.
• Legitimacy vs Reality: Later Khans continued to invoke the yasa as the “immutable code of Genghis Khan” to claim legitimacy and preserve their distinct identity, even while they adopted the sophisticated administrative methods of their subjects.

Yes, I agree.

• Bias of the Literati: History is usually written by city-dwellers (like Persian chroniclers or Chinese scholars) who viewed nomads as “barbarians” and “destroyers of civilization.”
• Inflated Casualties: This explains the exaggerated casualty figures in Persian chronicles (e.g., millions killed). These numbers were likely hyperbole used to portray the Mongols as the “Scourge of God” and to convey the sheer terror felt by the urban population in the face of the Mongol war machine.

While both were nomadic, their historical trajectories differed significantly:

• The Bedouins (Arabia): Their consolidation was driven by a religious revolution (Islam). They became the carriers of a new world religion and quickly integrated into urban centers (Mecca, Medina, Damascus), creating a Caliphate based on religious and linguistic (Arabic) unity.
• The Mongols (Steppe): Their consolidation was military and dynastic, driven by the charisma of Genghis Khan. They did not initially possess a “world religion” to export (practicing Shamanism) and often adopted the religions of their subjects (Buddhism, Islam, Christianity). Their empire was held together by military might and the yasa rather than a shared faith.

The account of the French monk William of Rubruck at the court of Mongke Khan (1254) vividly illustrates the cosmopolitan nature of the Pax Mongolica (Mongol Peace):

• Global Connectivity: It shows that the Mongol Empire connected the far ends of Eurasia. A French monk could travel safely from Europe to Mongolia, meeting people from Hungary and Paris in the heart of the Steppe.
• Cultural Melting Pot: The presence of Guillaume Boucher, a Parisian goldsmith working for the Khan, highlights the movement of skilled artisans and technology across the empire.
• Religious Tolerance: The account describes Nestorian Christians, Muslim clergy, and Buddhist monks all present at the court festivals, blessing the Grand Khan. This reflects the unique Mongol policy of religious tolerance which allowed diverse cultures to coexist within the empire.