Nationalism
NCERT Solutions • Class 11 Political Theory • Chapter 7Concepts of Nation
1. How is a nation different from other forms of collective belonging?
A nation is a unique form of collective belonging compared to families, tribes, or clans.
Differences:
Differences:
- Face-to-Face vs. Imagined: In a family or tribe, members usually know each other personally or have direct kinship ties. In a nation, members will never know most of their fellow members, yet “in the minds of each lives the image of their communion” (Benedict Anderson’s ‘Imagined Communities’).
- Basis of Unity: Families are united by descent/blood. Nations are united by shared beliefs, history, political ideals, and a vision for the future, rather than just blood ties.
- Scale and Permanence: Nations operate on a much larger scale and aspire for a permanent political existence (statehood), unlike smaller social groups.
4. Neither descent, nor language, nor religion or ethnicity can claim to be a common factor in nationalisms all over the world. Comment.
Comment: This statement is accurate. While some nations are formed on the basis of a single language or religion, it is not a universal rule.
Examples challenging the “One Language/Religion” theory:
Examples challenging the “One Language/Religion” theory:
- Language: Canada has two official languages (English and French). India has 22 scheduled languages. Yet, both are strong nations.
- Religion: The USA is a nation of immigrants with diverse religions. India is a secular nation with Hindus, Muslims, Christians, and Sikhs identifying as Indians.
- Conclusion: A nation is primarily a political community held together by a shared commitment to political values (like democracy, secularism) and a common history, rather than cultural homogeneity.
5. Illustrate with suitable examples the factors that lead to the emergence of nationalist feelings.
Factors leading to the emergence of nationalism include:
- Shared History: A sense of a continuing historical identity (e.g., India’s collective memory of the ancient civilization and the freedom struggle).
- Shared Territory: A deep connection to a specific land or ‘motherland’ (e.g., the Zionist movement’s attachment to Israel).
- Common Political Ideals: A shared vision of the state (e.g., the USA is united by belief in ‘Liberty’ and the Constitution).
- Common Political Identity: A desire for independent political existence (e.g., African nations emerging from colonization).
Self-Determination & Conflict
2. What is the right to national self-determination? How has it resulted in formation and challenges?
Meaning: The right to national self-determination is the claim that every distinct nation/people has the right to govern themselves, usually by forming their own independent state, free from external control.
Formation of States:
Formation of States:
- 19th Century Europe: Led to the unification of Germany and Italy.
- Post-WWI: Breakup of Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires into small nation-states.
- Decolonization (20th Century): Asian and African nations (like India, Kenya) used this right to gain independence from colonial rule.
- It creates challenges when smaller groups within an existing nation claim this right. For example, the demand for a separate Basque country in Spain or the Kurdish struggle in the Middle East challenges the integrity of existing borders.
3. “Nationalism can unite… as well as divide… liberate… as well as generate conflict.” Illustrate.
Nationalism is a double-edged sword:
- Unite and Liberate:
Example: Indian Freedom Struggle. Nationalism united diverse people (Bengalis, Punjabis, Tamils) against British rule, leading to liberation and the formation of a democratic state.
Example: Unification of Italy and Germany in the 19th century. - Divide and Generate Conflict:
Example: Partition of India (1947). Conflicting nationalisms (religious nationalism) led to the violent division of the country.
Example: Breakup of Yugoslavia. Ethnic nationalism led to a brutal civil war and the fragmentation of the country into smaller states (Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia).
Democracy & Limitations
6. How is a democracy more effective than authoritarian governments in dealing with conflicting nationalist aspirations?
Democracies are more effective because:
- Inclusion: Democracies allow diverse groups to participate in power-sharing (e.g., Belgium model), whereas authoritarian regimes suppress differences.
- Negotiation: In a democracy, nationalist demands can be negotiated constitutionally (e.g., granting special autonomy to regions like Quebec in Canada or Scotland in the UK).
- Legitimacy: Suppressing aspirations by force (authoritarianism) often breeds resentment and terrorism. Democratic dialogue provides a legitimate outlet for grievances.
7. What do you think are the limitations of nationalism?
Limitations of nationalism include:
- Intolerance: It can lead to hatred of “the other” (xenophobia) and minorities within the nation.
- War and Conflict: Extreme nationalism (Jingoism) has been the cause of two World Wars.
- Ignoring Global Issues: An obsession with national borders can prevent cooperation on global problems like climate change or pandemics that require a post-national approach.